[Tech Update] Benchmark Testing of UP 4000, UP, Raspberry Pi 4 & Jetson Nano

Options
FredyHsu
FredyHsu Administrator, Moderator, AAEON Posts: 49 admin
edited July 2022 in Tech Updates

image

UP 4000 benchmark, comparison with UP Board, Raspberry Pi 4 and Jetson Nano

Are you curious to know how UP 4000 performed? We have run a set of benchmarks on UP 4000, UP Board, Raspberry Pi 4, and Jetson Nano. Let’s have a look at the results:
image
Test Systems:
  • UP 4000 2GB RAM - Just released in 2022
  • UP Board 2GB RAM - Released in 2015
  • RPi4 4GB RAM - Released in 2019
  • Jetson Nano 4GB RAM - Released in 2019

UP 4000 vs UP Board Setup

 UP 4000  UP Board
Processor: Intel Celeron N3350 @ 2.40GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: AAEON UP-APL03 (UPAPBM06 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Celeron N3350/Pentium, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 31GB DA4032, Graphics: Intel HD 500 APL 2 2GB (650MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: PHL 275E1, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 Processor: Intel Atom x5-Z8350 @ 1.92GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: AAEON UP-CHT01 (UPC1BM0X BIOS), Chipset: Intel Atom/Celeron/Pentium, Memory: 1536MB, Disk: 31GB M52532, Graphics: Intel HD 1GB (500MHz), Monitor: PHL 273V7, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-1-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.6, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-1-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.6, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
 

Applications Tested:

  • SQLite
  • RAMspeed SMP
  • perf-bench
  • Go Benchmarks
  • Java SciMark
  • SciMark
  • X264
  • C-Ray
  • Parallel BZIP2 Compression
  • Node.js Octane Benchmark
  • LAME MP3 Encoding
  • GnuPG
  • Perl Benchmarks
  • System GZIP Decompression
  • OpenSSL
  • libjpeg-turbo tjbench
  • PyBench
  • PHPBench

Executive Summary of Result

UP 4000 2GB had the most wins, coming in first place for 83% of the tests. Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (UP 4000 2GB) was 1.853x the speed of the slowest (UPboard 2GB). RPi4 4GB was 0.654x the speed of UP 4000 2GB, Jetson Nano 4GB was 0.976x the speed of RPi4 4GB, UPboard 2GB was 0.845x the speed of Jetson Nano 4GB. The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included:
✔ PHPBench (PHP Benchmark Suite) at 2.298x
✔ PyBench (Total For Average Test Times) at 2.28x
✔ SciMark (Computational Test: Composite) at 2.26x
✔ Perl Benchmarks (Test: Pod2html) at 2.106x
✔ RAMspeed SMP (Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer) at 2.066x
✔ LAME MP3 Encoding (WAV To MP3) at 2.019x
✔ libjpeg-turbo tjbench (Test: Decompression Throughput) at 2.017x
✔ Java SciMark (Computational Test: Composite) at 1.971x
✔ System GZIP Decompression at 1.891x

 

Comparison Overview:

image
 

Results:

image
 
UP 4000 2GB had the most wins, coming in first place for 83% of the tests.

Comparison of UP 4000 with the UP Board system’s performance shows, superior performance for applications, Video Encoding, Compression, Decompression and for generic CPU and memory tests. Check the full benchmark report at https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2207012-UPBO-201005966